×

Academic Intelligence · Curated Daily

Explore the Frontier of Global Academia

AcademicHub aggregates real-time literature from top journals and preprint platforms. Build your personal research radar and let large language models compile cross-disciplinary analysis briefings automatically.

Authors: Ozturk ×
Shuffle
01.
bioRxiv (Bioinfo) 2026-06-24

A comprehensive analysis of calreticulin mutants reveals distinct biophysicochemical proprieties with a potential for refined targeted therapies

Calreticulin mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms result in the replacement of the C-terminus acidic sequence with a positively charged tail that causes pathological activation of the thrombopoietin. The two canonical variants are Type-1 and Type-2. The remaining are mainly classified as Type-1 or Type-2 like based on the wild type sequence retained. Here, we performed in silico biophysicochemical analyses of 76 CALR exon 9 frameshift variants by their sequence and predicted biophysical properties, complemented by structural modeling of the mutant homodimers. Beyond confirming the Type-1 versus Type-2 distinction, we found that the Type 1-like variants form a continuum of charge architecture along which two reproducible subgroups can be identified, rather than sharply separated classes. This work refines the conventional mechanism-based classification into a charge-resolved framework and provides testable hypotheses linking novel-tail chemistry to receptor activation in CALR-mutant neoplasms and paves the way for improved targeted therapies based on individual mutants characteristics

02.
arXiv (CS.AI) 2026-06-15

Generative AI for Managerial Decision-Making under Ambiguity and Sycophancy

arXiv:2603.03970v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly being integrated into complex business workflows, fundamentally shifting the boundaries of managerial decision-making. However, the reliability of its strategic advice in ambiguous business contexts remains a critical knowledge gap. To address this gap, this study compares multiple GenAI models in their ability to detect ambiguity, examines whether a systematic ambiguity-resolution process improves response quality, and investigates their susceptibility to sycophantic behavior when confronted with flawed managerial directives. Using a novel four-dimensional business ambiguity taxonomy, we conducted a human-in-the-loop experiment across strategic, tactical, and operational scenarios. The resulting decisions were assessed through a human-validated automated evaluation framework based on agreement, actionability, justification quality, and constraint adherence. The results show that our approach not only distinguishes different types of ambiguity, but also reveals how ambiguity resolution systematically changes model behavior. In particular, resolving ambiguities improved decision quality across all managerial levels, with the strongest gains observed in constraint adherence. The analysis further showed that sycophantic behavior is not uniform across models: some models challenged flawed assumptions, whereas others tended to comply with them. This study contributes to the bounded rationality literature by positioning GenAI as a cognitive scaffold that can detect and resolve ambiguities managers might overlook, while demonstrating that its artificial limitations require human oversight to ensure its reliability as a strategic partner.